|
Home
Editorial Board
Instructions
to Contributors
Contents
|

Volume
2, Issue 2, 2004
Conceptual
Spaces as a Framework for Knowledge Representations (pdf)
Peter Gärdenfors, Department of Cognitive Science, Lund
University, Sweden
The
dominating models of information processes have been based on symbolic
representations of information and
knowledge. During the last decades, a variety of non-symbolic models
have been proposed as superior. The prime
examples of models within the non-symbolic approach are neural
networks. However, to a large extent they lack a
higher-level theory of representation. In this paper, conceptual spaces
are suggested as an appropriate framework for non-symbolic models.
Conceptual spaces consist of a number of "quality dimensions" that
often are derived from perceptual mechanisms. It will be outlined how
conceptual spaces can represent various kind of information and how
they can be used to describe concept learning. The connections to
prototype theory will also be presented.
Incompatible
Implementations of Physical Symbol Systems (pdf)
Peter beim Graben, Institute of Linguistics and Interdisciplinary
Center for Dynamics of Complex Systems, University of Potsdam, Germany
Classical
cognitive science assumes that intelligently behaving systems must be
symbol processors that are implemented in physical systems such as
brains or digital computers. By contrast, connectionists suppose that
symbol manipulating systems could be approximations of neural networks
dynamics. Both classicists and connectionists argue that symbolic
computation and subsymbolic dynamics are incompatible, though on
different grounds. While classicists say that connectionist
architectures and symbol processors are either incompatible or the
former are mere implementations of the latter, connectionists reply
that neural networks might be incompatible with symbol processors
because the latter cannot be implementations of the former. In this
contribution, the notions of "incompatibility" and "implementation"
will be criticized to show that they must be revised in the context of
the dynamical system approach to cognitive science. Examples for
implementations of symbol processors that are incompatible with respect
to contextual topologies will be discussed.
Quantum Theory and the Division of the
World (pdf)
Rudolf Haag, Schliersee, Germany
We discuss
an ontological model suggested by quantum physics, in which the notion
of events is of central significance. The conventional objects are
considered as causal links between events. Localization in space-time
refers primarily to events, not to objects. The intrinsic indeterminacy
forces us to consider both possibilities and facts, corresponding to
the distinction between future and past. In presently existing
theories, the definition of individual events and their localization
properties depends on asymptotic arguments adapted to prevailing
situations. A
structural analogy is pointed out between a hermeneutically
developed phenomenological description, based on Husserl, of the process of
perceptual cognition on the one hand and quantum mechanical
measurement on the other hand. In Husserl's analytic phase of the cognition process,
the "intentionality-structure" of the subject/object union
prior to predication of a local object is an entangled symmetry-making state, and this
entanglement is broken in the synthetic phase when the particular local
object is constituted under the influence of an eidos ("inner horizon")
and the "facticity"
of the local world ("outer horizon"). Replacing "perceptual cognition" by
"measurement" and "subject" by "expert subject using a measuring device"
the analogy of a formal quantum structure is extended to the
conscious structure of all empirical cognition. This is laid out in three theses: about
perception, about classical measurement, and about quantum measurement.
The results point to the need for research into the quantum structure of
the physical embodiment of human cognition.
The Partitioned
Quantum Universe: Entanglement and the Emergence of Functionality (pdf)
Günter Mahler, Institute for Theoretical Pysics, University of
Stuttgart, Germany
Given that
the world as we perceive it appears to be predominantly classical, how
can we stabilize quantum effects? Given the fundamental description of
our world is quantum mechanical, how do classical phenomena emerge?
Answers can be found from the analysis of the scaling properties of
modular quantum systems with respect to a given level of description.
It is argued that, depending on design, such partitioned quantum
systems may support various functions. Despite their local appearance
these functions are emergent properties of the system as a whole. With
respect to the separation of subject and object such functions of
interest are control, simulation, and observation. They are interpreted
in close analogy with more basic physical behavior.
Bohr's
Complementarity and Goldstein's Holism in Reflective Pragmatism (pdf)
Klaus Michael Meyer-Abich, Hamburg,
Germany
Although Niels Bohr's notion of complementarity is usually referred to
in the context of quantum mechanics, it is not of physical origin. Bohr
derived it from the philosophical idea of a holistic entanglement of
knowledge and action.
Bohr's complementarity primarily refers to a key element of the
pragmatist tradition, the reflective relation between the immediate
experience of an object and the awareness of its objectification.
Similar relations have been
observed by Kurt Goldstein in his studies of brain-injured patients.
Weak
Quantum Theory and the Emergence of Time (pdf)
Hartmann Römer, Department of Physics, University of Freiburg,
Germany
We present a scenario describing how time emerges in the framework of
weak quantum theory. In a process similar to the emergence of time in
quantum cosmology, time arises after an epistemic split of an undivided unus mundus as a quality of the
individual conscious mind. Synchronization with matter and other mental
systems is achieved by entanglement correlations. In the course of its
operationalization, time loses its original quality and the time of
physics as measured by clocks appears.
Last revision:
6 December 2004
|